Saturday, April 29, 2017

Don't Step in the Leadership


The title of this piece comes from a collection of Dilbert cartoons published in 1999. Having worked in health care for 45 years, I have worked for many people who were in leadership positions. Fortunately, the vast majority were good to work for. On the other hand, some (I can count them on one hand), made you often feel like the gentleman above.
From the good leaders, I learned to understand and apply such things as team building, using critical thinking and analysis, finance, coaching employees, dealing with difficult issues (such as layoffs or workplace violence), and a host of other helpful skills.
From the not-so-great leaders, while they may have had and could at times effectively use many of the above-mentioned skills, the takeaway for me was often based upon the Adult Learning Principle of "How It's Not Done".
Without mentioning any names (although some among you may recognize the individual, who is no longer in a leadership position), here are some examples of things I learned but chose not to adopt:
1) Have a meeting to have a meeting. For me, meetings without purpose are a major turnoff and waste of my time. I prep for meetings that I facilitate; plan an agenda, start on time, guide discussion to stay on track, etc. This leader started off by often being late and often seemed to be making things up at the moment. It was frequently painful.
2) Annual employee evaluations are very important. When I worked in non-union environments, and evaluations were connected to pay raises, employees saw some value to them and had some motivation related to them. In union environments, where pay raises are negotiated and take place regardless of the evaluation, employees are less motivated. I remember one employee (in a union environment) saying to me during the meeting the discuss his evaluation, "Why should I excel? I get paid the same for being mediocre." I prefer to have in place a system in which feedback is provided in the moment. Some places have eliminated annual employee evaluations, and I support that idea as long as the feedback system is in place.
3) Hear, but don't listen. A frequent comment I heard made about this leader is that the individual "just doesn't listen." One example of this occurred when a service was being offered regionally, so employees would have to leave work to drive to the site to receive the service. The leader wanted the service providers to come to the employees work site. I was instructed to contact the person coordinating the service and request that the service be provided at our work site. The person responded to my email, explained why the system was regional, rather than coming to each individual site (making perfect sense) and politely declining the request. This was passed on to the leader, whose response was "Ask her again." Sometimes, the answer is no and you just need to move on and find another way. For this particular leader, the skill was lacking.
4) If no one agrees with you, look around until you find someone who will. This leader had a proposal that no one in the "leadership group" supported. The solution? Hire a consultant who generates a report which (amazingly) says that the leader's idea is a great idea and should be implemented. While some consultants can be useful in some situations, this was clearly a case of the consultant saying what she was paid to say. From my perspective, if everyone around you thinks you are wrong, perhaps you should re-evaluate your position on this issue. Giving up and walking away is sometimes the most prudent thing but, for this leader, it was not a skill the individual chose to exercise often enough.
5) If the news isn't good, manipulate the data or change the vocabulary or eliminate the discussion. This leader had data on an unpleasant topic broken into two categories, and sent data from only one category up the chain to that individual's leadership. Needless to say, things looked better then they actually were. For a major project that was under-resourced and not going well, I was prohibited by the leader from saying anything negative about it in meetings (I am thinking the same thing happened with some of my colleagues). I have this thing about being honest, so I found this philosophy and approach to be a bit distasteful.
6) Just because you can't rationally explain why you want to do something, it doesn't mean it's not a good idea. Common sense would tell you that, if you want people to support an idea, being able to present a rational reason as to why you want to do it is a no-brainer. This leader had an obsession with wanting to reduce the workforce. I have gone through instances in hospitals where the decision was made to reduce the workforce to reduce expenses, but the expectation was never to do so without also making some changes in how services were delivered. This leader obviously did not or could not put together the complete plan, but also could not let go of the change.
While there are multiple other examples I could give, the takeaway is that some people end up in positions of leadership where they are not successful, and people around them have to work in an environment that can often be frustrating and toxic. In this particular case, as Yoda would say, "The Force is weak in this one."
Even though I stepped in it while I was there, I learned.











Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Flying Somewhere? Maybe Not


A few days ago, a paying passenger who was waiting in his seat for the plane to take off, was forcefully removed from the plane by police. His crime? He had been "selected" by the airline to get bumped so that they could use the seats to transport airline employees. Admittedly, the airline first sought volunteers. Veteran airline travelers know they can get paid well, with sometimes hotel and meals added in, if they give up their seat and take a later flight. Many are willing to accept the offer.
This particular passenger, though, wanted to get where he was going without being delayed (understandable) and refused to give up his seat. The police were called, things escalated to using force, and the passenger was dragged off of the plane, being filmed by fellow passengers.
Unfortunately for you and me, what the airline did (bumping the passenger to give the seat to someone else) is perfectly legal. The law, as well as the "Terms and Conditions" under which they sell you a ticket, allow them to do this. As a result, it is a common practice to sell more tickets than the plane has seats.
Why is this tolerated? Times have changed. Many airlines have gone bankrupt, and the remaining ones run fewer flights. With fewer seats available, the planes are generally full. When you buy a ticket, it is with the understanding that "if you want to fly with us, this is the way it is". The Federal government also appears to be disinclined to prohibit this practice. Have you ever heard of a member of Congress getting bumped? I doubt that would ever happen. Members of Congress get to fly for free anytime they want (the Department of the Treasury pays for their travel, no questions asked). It is more likely that you would get bumped to free up a seat for a member of Congress than one of them get bumped for you.
Call me old fashioned, but I have a problem with this. If I purchase a service, such as an airline ticket, I expect the service to be delivered. Granted, the service is delivered the vast majority of the time, but the fact that you can get screwed over and it's OK is not OK.
In social media regarding this incident, some people are advocating boycotting United Airlines. While this would be easy for me (I have not flown in over 20 years and have no plans to do so), some people (business travelers, for instance) do not have another viable option.
My question to the airlines is: Is there any need for the practice of bumping to continue? If the airline sells a ticket, they are paid up front. If the ticket holder does not show, the seat is empty but also paid for. Does the airline refund the fare to someone who does not show up for the flight? I doubt it. They charge fees if you want to change to a different flight, but they also already have your money.
To me, buying an airline ticket is a gamble. Granted, you are more likely to fly than not, but not all of us are willing to accept getting bumped. To get me to be willing to fly again, it would have to be a REALLY extraordinary circumstance, and I don't see that on the horizon. As long as the current policies and practices continue, I will be boycotting United Airlines and everyone else.